Is a Star Trek phaser possible?
It is important to note that while phasers aren’t theoretically impossible, they may not become what we imagine them to be today. Phasers, if they are anything like lasers, are nothing more than propagated beams of light, which travels from point A to point B in one direction (a straight line).
How much is an original Star Trek phaser worth?
A one-of-a-kind phaser rifle used by William Shatner in the second pilot episode made for the original Star Trek series sold for $231,000 at an auction conducted by Julien’s.
Are Star Trek phasers lasers?
The phasers you see in the 23rd and 24th century do not generate lasers or particle beams, though. They instead radiate via a surge of plasma which excites a crystal emitter: this then discharges via the rapid nadion effect.
What do Star Trek phasers do?
According to later series, phasers release a beam of fictional subatomic particles called “rapid nadion”, which are then refracted (“rectified”) through superconducting crystals.
Can phasers be fired at warp?
Phasers are supposed to work fine at warp. Nobody on screen ever suggests otherwise. And they are seen working fine at warp. It’s just that they are generally fired only at very short apparent ranges – but that is true of sublight firing, too.
How long does a phaser stun last?
Light Stun – causes central nervous system impairment on humanoids, unconsciousness for up to five minutes.
Who designed the original Star Trek phaser?
The Star Trek: The Original Series type 1 phaser, as the designation was first identified on screen in TOS: “The Devil in the Dark”, was designed by Matt Jefferies and John Jefferies with input from Gene Roddenberry, and was built (or the construction supervised by him at the Desilu prop shop) by Matt Jefferies, and …
Is Phaser copyrighted?
Photon Storm Ltd owns the trademark Phaser. The trademark is registered in both word and logo form. Any mark starting with the word Phaser or is sufficiently similar to one or more of the trademarks that permission will be needed in order to use it.
Is Star Trek based in science?
The Star Trek series are the only science fiction series crafted with such respect for real science and intelligent writing. That’s why it’s the only science fiction series that many scientists watch regularly . . .
Does stun damage ignore soak?
Stun Damage (Passive) In this case, the weapon deals damage as strain instead of wounds. This damage is still reduced by a target’s soak.
Are Star Wars and Star Trek The same thing?
This is because Star Wars and Star Trek are really arguably different. Although Star Wars and Star Trek are both arresting illustrations of modern scientific discipline fiction, they are non the same. Star Trek and Star Wars each posses similar and different general constructs, subjects, and motivations.
Who destroyed Star Trek?
– Vulcan, with around 6 billion inhabitants – 9 starships destroyed – At least 2 Enterprise fatalities ( Olson, Puri) – Captain Pike taken prisoner (later rescued alive) – Damage to portside section of Enterprise
Is Star Trek underrated?
Star Trek:. Enterprise is underrated : scifi Star Trek:. Enterprise is underrated It’s actually got some pretty interesting storylines. Leaves your wondering what could’ve been. It had its moments, but I think it squandered most of its four seasons. I’m not shocked that the network canceled it.
Can Star Wars beat Star Trek?
William Shatner argues that Star Trek is superior to Star Wars. According to him, “Star Trek had relationships and conflict among the relationships and stories that involved humanity and philosophical questions”. Shatner believes that Star Wars was only better than Star Trek in terms of special effects, and that once J.J. Abrams became involved, Star Trek was able to “supersede Star Wars on every level”.