What are the two sides of the euthanasia debate?

Euthanasia involves a clash of two important values: respect for individual autonomy and respect for life. Pro-euthanasia advocates give priority to autonomy; anti-euthanasia proponents to respect for life.

What is the ethical dilemma of euthanasia?

The ethical debate of PAS and euthanasia seems to be autonomy against versions of non-maleficence and beneficence. Because ethical principles are paired against each other, PAS and euthanasia are ethical dilemmas waiting to happen for both physicians and counselors.

Why is it important to talk about euthanasia?

For the dying person, euthanasia talk offers a way to emotionally manage fear, uncertainty, and isolation caused by the often chaotic course of an end-of-life illness. It gives all participants (patients, families, and physicians) an active role at a time when roles are often at best unclear and at worst diminishing.

When making ethical decisions no one stands outside a social and?

When making ethical decisions, no one stands outside a social and cultural world. Each of us judges human reality according to a set of adopted and adapted moral criteria based on such factors as nationality, education, social class, professional occupation, and, of course, religious affiliation.

What is the Voluntary Euthanasia Society?

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 The Voluntary Euthanasia Society (VES) was founded in 1935 by a group of eminent doctors, theologians and lawyers. VES believes the patient should be the decision maker at the end of life irrespective of whether he wishes to prolong his life, or ask for medical help to die if terminally ill.

How do managers make decisions ethically?

The ethical decision making framework for managers relies on reasoning using the principles of rights, justice, utility, and care. It presupposes that managerial decision makers have the capacity to reason from principles in making an ethical decision.