What does but not limited to mean in a contract?

Here is a summary of what “but not limited to” means: It’s a phrase used in the formal English language, contracts, official documents and legal writing. It is used to refer to things part of a group. The group should be understood to be part of a larger group. It’s used to present a non-exhaustive list.

How do you write including but not limited to?

There isn’t any particular punctuation needed when writing “include but not limited to” as long as the list is short. You merely have to put commas in after each item on the list (as given in the examples above) and place the word “and” before the last item.

Does including mean including but not limited to?

The best simple solution is to define including as meaning “including but not limited to” in every legal instrument in which the word is used—among the housekeeping provisions. Then you rigorously avoid the cumbersome phrasing each time you want to introduce examples.

What does without limitation mean legally?

Any agreement, instrument or statute defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument that is referred to herein means such agreement, instrument or statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including (in the case of agreements or instruments) by waiver or consent and (in the case …

Do you need comma before including?

Whether “including” requires a comma will depend on what the word is doing in your sentence. If it is part of a non-restrictive or unessential clause or phrase, you need a comma. On the other hand, if “including” is the start of a phrase that is essential to your sentence’s meaning, you should not add a comma.

What Does not limited to meaning in legal terms?

Sample 1. including, but not limited to, means that the definition is applicable to the examples that are cited, and to other examples that are not cited, which are deemed to be similar in purpose and consistent with the intent of the definition.

Should including but not limited to have commas?

A. No punctuation is required, but commas after including and to would work just fine; they may be helpful if the phrase introduces a long or complex list. Dashes would work as well.

Does including mean including without limitation?

Phrases introduced by the word “including” and similar expressions do not limit the scope of the meaning of the words to which they relate. Including Without Limitation. The term “including” shall mean including without limitation.

What does including mean in law?

Including and includes have traditionally been used to introduce a nonexhaustive list. Here’s how Black’s Law Dictionary defines include: “To contain as a part of something. The participle including typically indicates a partial list (the plaintiff asserted five tort claims, including slander and libel).”

How do you punctuate including?

Explanation: Use a comma before including if the sentence would be complete without the part that follows. (The same rule applies to such as.)

What does by way of illustration and not limitation mean?

By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation = as examples that do not restrict the range of possible (types of cheating). including but not by way of limitation = as examples that do not restrict the range of possible (types of intellectual property).

Do I need comma before including?

What does “including but not limited to” mean in a contract?

Instead of listing all the possible third-party information that may be entrusted with Party A, the phrase “including but not limited to” is used to maintain the general scope of the obligation but also provide some specifics. From a legal perspective, this begs the question. Is this supposed to be an exhaustive list or a non-exhaustive list?

What is the difference between’including’and’not limited to’in English?

Although the words “including” and “not limited to” are similar, though not identical, in meaning, adding “not limited to” expands on “including” to broaden the scope of things covered.

How do you use including without limitation?

So it’s now standard practice for drafters to use the phrases including without limitation and including but not limited to (and their equivalents using includes) with the aim of making it clear that the unrestricted meaning applies. And caselaw offers a measure of support.

Can you include or include in a contract?

Contracts or legal instruments drafted using this protocol, Garner argues, will ensure that you do not inadvertently limit the scope of your contractual provision when you introduce examples. “courts have proved willing to consider that including or includes is restrictive even when modified by but not limited to”.