What happens if you side with Amita in Far Cry 4?

What happens if you side with Amita in Far Cry 4?

If the player sides with Amita: In the mission To Reap What You Sow, if Amita is selected to lead the Golden Path, she will order Ajay to kill Sabal, arguing that by splitting the Golden Path, he will inevitably create another civil war and betray Ajay for siding with her.

What happens if you spare Sabal?

Amita is the leader of the Golden Path Head to the place shown on the map and locate Sabal on the top of the stairs in a small hut. After a conversation, you will only have a short while to shoot him. You can also spare Sabal’s life and you will never see him again.

Where is Sabal after sparing him?

If you sided with Sabal you can find him at Jalendu Temple, the temple on the island you had to save or to blow up.

Can you spare Amita Sabal?

Amita is the leader of the Golden Path You can shoot Sabal or spare his life. Amita will ask you to kill Sabal, who wants the division of the Golden Path.

Why did you choose Sabal over Amita?

I chose Sabal, since he seemed to value human lives more than Amita. Stuck with him after that mostly because I felt I had already made my choice. The choices just tweak a few missions and give you a hidden cutscene at the end of the game.

What happens when you choose to find the intelligence for Amita?

Choosing to find the intelligence for Amita will result in the death of nine of Sabal’s best men, but also tips Amita off to an impending attack on a Golden Path monastery. When Sabal learns of an Opium farm operating out of an abandoned tea factory, he asks Ajay to burn the fields in order to prevent Kyrat from becoming a drug state.

Is the Himalayas in Far Cry 4?

Step into a vast, unknowable land once again in this fourth game in the Far Cry franchise. The vertical landscape of the Himalayas isn’t just a pretty backdrop, but a playground that encourages the player to fight, hunt and explore. Flame On! Awakened!

Is Amita the lesser of the evils?

Amita seems to be the lesser of the evils and tends to think more objectively thus her decisions are more tactically sound. Although at times her moral empathy seems to be lacking.